Rage Against the Machine News


Editorials, and Editorial Replies from the Bergen Record:

. . . On police and a concert

Tuesday, January 26, 1999

A Sunday editorial said the state police have to patrol the meadowlands benefit concert for a man who is on Death Row in Pennsylvania for killing a police officer.

Helen Skunca, Hackensack

It is deplorable that any amount of money will be spent on state police patrol for this farce in the name of free speech. Cancel this abomination; give the money to a community food bank or the Policemen's Benevolent Association. We are in big trouble when someone like Abu-Jamal has the right to a benefit concert but we as a state cannot legally stop it. The inevitable violence that will result from this concert is too frightening even to think about. That's good enough reason to cancel the show.

Don Holmes, Bergenfield

If they are holding a benefit concert for Mumia Abu-Jamal, a convicted cop killer, what's next? A bake sale for Charles Manson? Too bad Jeffrey Dahmer is gone; my car could use a wash.

Michael Massoni, Hackensack

I would agree that it's hard not to sympathize with the feelings of the police. However, although it may be hard for them to do, they have to realize that their position is to protect and to serve.

Once you allow the police the option of whom to protect, then they're no longer police; they're private security being vended out to the highest bidder. The best way to handle something like this when feelings are so high is say nothing. As soon as things get printed, you're going to attract people who might come to this event to accidentally on purpose bump into a policeman and create an incident so that people will say, "We told you this was going to happen."

To the Editor:

Governor Whitman, the FOP and the State Police fail to understand the real issue regarding Mumia Abu Jamal.� The Rage Against the Machine concert will benefit his legal defense, to which all Americans are entitled. Individuals accused of certain crimes, such as killing a police officer or child, are often viewed as having less rights, as monsters.� Instead of being treated as innocent until proven guilty, there is a lynch-mob mentality - "Let's string 'em up!"� Our laws and Constitution were written to protect just such individuals and ensure they receive an impartial trial and judgment.� Police officers and Governors alike are sworn to enforce and uphold these laws.� Unfortunately in this case they can't see the forest for the trees.

Many politicians often criticize today's youth as apathetic.� Yet when a group like Rage Against the Machine tries to motivate young people to become involved in political and social issues they are condemned by those same politicians.� Perhaps the benefit should be changed to something they support, like paying for an investigation of the President's sex life.

Matthew Bernick

Police and a concert

The benefit boils down to a free-speech issue
Sunday, January 24, 1999

THE CONCERT planned for Thursday in the Meadowlands, a benefit to raise money for Mumia Abu-Jamal, is expected to go on as planned. And state police will patrol the area, even though Abu-Jamal has been convicted of killing a Philadelphia police officer and is currently on Death Row in Pennsylvania.

It's understandable that the state police would be upset about the concert and about having to patrol it. But as state Attorney General Peter Verniero said last week, there is no legal way to stop the show. Governor Whitman has urged concertgoers to boycott the sold-out performance at the Continental Airlines Arena, and anyone who did not know that the concert was a benefit for Abu-Jamal and does not want to support it should get his money back.

However, it is also true, as Mr. Verniero said, that this is a free-speech issue, and "we cherish freedom of speech in this country."

Abu-Jamal, whose case has received worldwide attention, claims he did not receive a fair trial when he was convicted in 1982 of the shooting death of Officer Daniel Faulkner, who had stopped Abu-Jamal's brother for a traffic violation.

Lawyers for Abu-Jamal say that prosecutors withheld evidence and that previous defense lawyers were ineffective. Abu-Jamal has also maintained it was unfair that the judge who presided over his original trial also presided over his request for a new trial. The judge rejected the request, and the case is now being appealed in the federal courts.

Clearly, feelings run extremely high on both sides.

But ticket buyers are going to the concert for a variety of reasons. Some just want to hear the music. Others are going because they feel mistakes may have been made in Abu-Jamal's case, and others support his cause entirely.

But it's hard not to sympathize with the feeling of police who believe that the attendance at the concert amounts to nothing more than tacit support for a man convicted of the murder of a police officer.


<<<<< back to central